Animal testing 'conflict' between EU Cosmetic Regulation and ECHA's REACH regulation says study

A study has identified a number of EU cosmetic ingredients tested on animals since the Cosmetics Regulation ban; data largely collected to prove worker and environmental safety under REACH or because alternative testing methods were rejected, researchers say.

Internationalization of Read-Across as a Validated New Approach Method (NAM) for Regulatory Toxicology. - Document - Gale Academic OneFile

PDF) A State-of-the-Art Review on the Alternatives to Animal Testing for the Safety Assessment of Cosmetics

Frontiers Use of new approach methodologies (NAMs) to meet regulatory requirements for the assessment of industrial chemicals and pesticides for effects on human health

Cosmetics, Free Full-Text

ECHA decision on animal tests for cosmetic ingredients angers campaigners

Global Service Providers Guide 2022 by Chemical Watch - Issuu

Cosmetics, Free Full-Text

Frontiers Use of new approach methodologies (NAMs) to meet regulatory requirements for the assessment of industrial chemicals and pesticides for effects on human health

Animal Testing

Cosmetics, Free Full-Text

Upholding the EU's Commitment to 'Animal Testing as a Last Resort' Under REACH Requires a Paradigm Shift in How We Assess Chemical Safety to Close the Gap Between Regulatory Testing and Modern

Court of the CJEU: cosmetic ingredients may be tested on animals - Jurisprudence